Third Panel Discussion
Third Panel Discussion
topic : fair treatment of clones
making new rules for clones
→ how to distinguish between normal people and clones.
Members
Nancy Berry (24) / a buyer
→ she is a moderator of this discussion.
Erinn Gray (22) / a fruiterer
Sophia Harris (31) / an announcer
Maggie Levitt (24) / a bank clerk
Kaitlyn McFly Kim (25) / a car designer
Ghosn Zoo (25) / a toilet cleaner
Contents
First, Kathy introduced how to make clones.
Sophia : she agrees with this idea. She said clones human is convenient.
Maggie : she agrees, too. she said she wanted to make rules to prevent bank clerk.
Errin : she agrees, too. she said she wanted to do so in order to prevent some troubles.
Kathy : she agrees, too.
Ghosn : he didn't say he was agree. he was thinking about how to distinguish between them.
Questions
Do normal people and clones have the same name ?
→ Maggie said i don't know.
What is trouble which Errin said?
→ It's illegal situation. it means alibi.
We can't distinguish with clones and normal people, right?
→ we can do it because clones have microchip in their body.
A audience said this idea is strange because clones are made for organ transplantation but they spend their life as normal people.
→ since 2013, clones and normal people are consensus.
A audience said he has a friend who is a clone, but he doesn't think his friend cause a crime. Is it really need ?
→ yes.
Is it good to stop to use face recognition?
→ microchip is just number.
Result
We cannot reach the consensus.
My opinion
I find this problem very difficult. This discussion was very thoughtful. However, I'm not very familiar with clones, so it was too difficult to talk about and I couldn't understand the contents halfway.
I think it's discrimination when distinguishing between clones and normal people.
コメント
コメントを投稿