Third Panel Discussion

 Third Panel Discussion


topic : fair treatment of clones 

    making new rules for clones 

    → how to distinguish between normal people and clones.


Members

 Nancy Berry (24) / a buyer
 → she is a moderator of this discussion.

 Erinn Gray (22) / a fruiterer

 Sophia Harris (31) / an announcer

 Maggie Levitt (24) / a bank clerk

 Kaitlyn McFly Kim (25) / a car designer

Ghosn Zoo (25) / a toilet cleaner


Contents

First, Kathy introduced how to make clones.
 
Sophia : she agrees with this idea. She said clones human is convenient.

Maggie : she agrees, too. she said she wanted  to make rules to prevent bank clerk.

Errin : she agrees, too. she said she wanted to do so in order to prevent some troubles.

Kathy : she agrees, too.

Ghosn : he didn't say he was agree. he was thinking about how to distinguish between them.


Questions

Do normal people and clones have the same name ?
→ Maggie said i don't know.

What is trouble which Errin said?
→ It's illegal situation. it means alibi.

We can't distinguish with clones and normal people, right?
→ we can do it because clones have microchip in their body.

A audience said this idea is strange because clones are made for organ transplantation but they spend their life as normal people.
→ since 2013, clones and normal people are consensus.

A audience said he has a friend who is a clone, but he doesn't think his friend cause a crime. Is it really need ?
→ yes. 

Is it good to stop to use face recognition?
→ microchip is just number.

Result 

We cannot reach the consensus.

My opinion
I find this problem very difficult.  This discussion was very thoughtful.  However, I'm not very familiar with clones, so it was too difficult to talk about and I couldn't understand the contents halfway.
 I think it's discrimination when distinguishing between clones and normal people.

 

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

Fifth Panel Discussion

9th Panel Discussion

Apollon Karin Komatsu